In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Association for Energy Economics (IRAEE)

Document Type : ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Authors

1 PhD student in Economic, Aras international campus, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Professor, Faculty of Economic and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran,

10.30473/egdr.2026.79409.7162

Abstract

This empirical study investigates the interplay between geopolitical distance (IPD) and economic sanctions on Iran's bilateral trade with 15 major partners over 2015-2023. It estimates IPD's overall effect, its intensification after the 2022 Ukraine war, isolates sanction impacts, and assesses Iran's trade orientation toward the Eastern bloc. Results confirm IPD significantly reduces trade, with a coefficient of -0.210 (10% level), translating to a 19% average decrease per unit increase. The post-2022 period shows exacerbated negative effects via an interaction coefficient of -0.110 (1% level), indicating a 10.4% amplification of IPD's adverse impact. While the direct sanction effect is unidentified due to collinearity with year-fixed effects (+0.214), its interaction with IPD is significantly negative (-0.168 at 5%), demonstrating that sanctions critically amplify geopolitical trade barriers. Block heterogeneity analysis reveals IPD's negative impact is substantially weaker in the Eastern bloc (-0.108) than in the Western bloc (-0.208), statistically confirming Iran's structural pivot toward Eastern markets. Crucially, excluding China and Russia reduces the IPD coefficient to an insignificant -0.010, suggesting observed geopolitical friction concentrates on these two principal Eastern partners. Overall, empirical evidence establishes IPD as a significant, persistent, and growing impediment to Iran's trade. Its influence markedly intensified after the Ukraine conflict, with sanctions acting as a multiplier. Nevertheless, Iran's distinct trade resilience with the Eastern bloc, particularly China and Russia, underscores a strategic reorientation partially mitigating these constraints, highlighting asymmetric effects of global political fractures on trade flows.

Keywords

Main Subjects